Here's recap to the response to a New York Times article that had some omissions identified here. Highlights of this response is:
Saul Hansell’s August 22 story (“Misgivings Spoil Plans of Start-Up”) was a disturbing departure from the high journalistic standards normally associated with the Times. Instead of a well-researched financial piece concerning an internet technology company’s IPO, Mr. Hansell chose to write a tabloid-like hatchet job featuring irrelevant mistatements regarding my past. To set the record straight: (1) what Mr. Hansell called my “recent legal problems” concern my plea of guilty in 1999 to conduct that occurred years earlier, well before the company having the IPO came into being; (2) I have never been charged by any government agency with improper conduct in connection with the 1996 election campaign of Senator Torricelli; (3) my then future wife was not in fact “paid $1.4 million to serve ”as the company’s chief operating officer in the 15 months before our marriage”; and (4) the income mistakenly attributed to me personally was actually paid to my 12-person international strategic planning and business development firm.
Further information can be found here - Armand Rousso response to NYT story by Saul Hansell
This is a sponsored post
